In 2025, 29 per cent of the volume of the wood con- tracts were conducted under Metsä Group Plus. Looking at the forests already integrated into the Plus system, it is clear that various species are already very much on the growth path. “For example, blueberry and lingonberry are more abundant in these forests.” WINDOWS TO THE FUTURE Yet, change in a forest doesn’t happen overnight: that’s why it’s important to create future scenarios for forests’ development. “Forecasting the future is a big part of the model,” Lehesvirta says. Metsä Group isn’t alone in its quest to champion regenerative forests. In addition to forest owners, officials, companies, associations and universities are joining forces to advance the cause. The University of Jyväskylä is a key partner in the science department: “We formed a strategic partnership with the Univer- sity of Jyväskylä in June 2025 and we’re looking at many forestry issues together.” A recent result is the launch of a new PhD pro- gramme in January 2026 to investigate regenerative forestry more deeply. The programme received over 70 applications from researchers, suggesting that the topic is seen as having some relevance in the academic community. “The scientific foundation for regenerative forestry keeps strengthening all the time. Next stop: making these ideas and measures mainstream,” Lehesvirta concludes.
METSÄ GROUP PLUS HAS BEEN AVAILABLE FOR METSÄ GROUP’S OWNER- MEMBERS FOR ALMOST THREE YEARS.
36
METSÄ GROUP PLUS IN PRACTICE – TOP 4
1. More retention trees and high biodiversity stumps are left per hectare of forest during felling. Only five species out of nearly thirty are harvested. 2. Wider buffer zones are left along shorelines. 3. In lush drained spruce-dominated peatlands, continuous cover methods are used instead of regeneration felling, and drainage ditches are not repaired in connection with felling. 4. More protective thickets are left during young stand management.
BOARD MAGAZINE
Powered by FlippingBook